Why GREAT ACTING TRAINING STILL DOESN’T GET ACTORS CAST
- Jeffrey Dreisbach

- 4 minutes ago
- 4 min read
The painful disconnect nobody talks about

What if the very thing your acting class praised… is the exact thing hurting your auditions?
Today we’re talking about the disconnect between acting training… and actually getting cast.
And trust me… this conversation might sting a little.
But it may also completely change how you approach your work.
INTRODUCTION
Hello everyone and welcome back to Casting Actors Cast!
I’m Jeffrey Dreisbach.
Actor, teacher, casting director, author, podcaster… occasional over-caffeinated observer of strange actor behavior.
And today we’re discussing something I have been thinking about for years.
Why is it… that some actors who are absolutely BRILLIANT in class… struggle terribly in auditions?
Meanwhile… other actors who maybe aren’t the most emotionally explosive people in the room… walk in and book.
Why does that happen?
Now before anyone throws a copy of Stanislavski at my head— this is not an anti-training episode.
Training matters. Craft matters. Technique matters.
But somewhere along the way… a lot of actors accidentally begin training for acting class instead of training for professional performance.
And those are not always the same thing.
Let’s discuss it.
SEGMENT 1 — THE “GOOD ACTOR” TRAP
One of the biggest dangers actors face… is becoming very good at looking like they are acting.
You know exactly what I mean.
The actor who: • breathes deeply before every line • looks emotionally devastated after ordering coffee • pauses dramatically before saying “Hello” • treats every scene like they’re accepting an Oscar while trapped inside a tornado
Listen. We’ve all done it.
Actors are emotional athletes. We care deeply. We want to create moving work.
But here’s the problem.
In professional auditions… casting isn’t asking:
“Can this actor demonstrate emotional intensity?”
They’re asking:
“Would I believe this person exists?”
Huge difference.
Some actors enter auditions like they’re defending a doctoral thesis in sadness.
And meanwhile… another actor walks in, behaves truthfully, stays simple, listens, affects the other person… and books the job.
That’s the disconnect.
SEGMENT 2 — CLASSROOM ACTING VS CAMERA ACTING
Now this gets tricky because acting classes often reward effort.
Especially emotional effort.
The actor crying in class may receive attention. The actor screaming may seem committed. The actor emotionally unraveling in a scene may appear “brave.”
But camera acting is different.
The camera loves: • specificity • behavior • thought • restraint • truthful need
Not theatrical demonstration.
The camera sees EVERYTHING.
Including when you’re trying too hard.
Especially when you’re trying too hard.
And here’s the uncomfortable truth:
A lot of actors are addicted to feeling emotional instead of doing something meaningful.
That’s huge.
REALITY CHECK
Okay. Real casting room truth here.
The actors who consistently work?
They are often simpler than you think.
They are not trying to “show” the performance.
They are: • pursuing something • affecting someone • staying grounded • remaining available moment-to-moment
And because of that… they feel alive.
The actor who is “demonstrating” emotion often feels planned.
And planned acting rarely feels dangerous.
SEGMENT 3 — SCHOOL IS OVER
This next part may sound harsh.
An audition is not a grade.
Nobody is sitting there with a rubric saying:
“Excellent emotional tension… slightly weak eyebrow work… wonderful sadness posture.”
That’s not happening.
But many actors still audition like nervous students.
They walk into the room thinking:
“Please approve of me.”
And that energy changes everything.
Because actors seeking approval become careful.
Careful acting is usually dead acting.
Professional actors don’t walk in trying to be “good.”
They walk in trying to do something.
That shift matters enormously.
SEGMENT 4 — WHAT CASTING ACTUALLY RESPONDS TO
So what DOES casting respond to?
Truthfully?
Behavior.
Specific behavior rooted in human need.
Not generalized emotion.
For example:
Instead of: “I’m sad.”
The actor is: “Trying to stop this person from leaving me.”
That becomes playable.
Suddenly the performance becomes active.
Now we’re watching: • persuasion • pressure • vulnerability • humor • manipulation • charm • denial
That’s human behavior.
And human behavior is infinitely more watchable than emotional indication.
SEGMENT 5 — THE BEGINNING OF A DIFFERENT APPROACH
Over the years… working in casting rooms and classrooms… I started noticing patterns.
The actors who booked most often weren’t necessarily: • the loudest • the most emotional • the most technical
They were usually: • behavior-driven • specific • emotionally available • deeply connected to what they needed • focused on the other person
And that realization started changing how I teach.
Instead of asking: “How should this feel?”
I began asking: “What are you trying to get?”
That one shift changes everything.
QUICK EXERCISE FOR ACTORS
Try this tonight.
Take a scene.
Cross out every emotional adjective.
No: • angry • sad • nervous • devastated
Instead ask: “What am I trying to get from the other person?”
Then play ONLY that.
Watch what happens.
Your work will likely become: • simpler • clearer • more dangerous • more believable
And honestly? Probably more castable.
CONCLUSION
Great acting training absolutely matters.
But training should not become emotional gymnastics.
Acting is not emotional decoration.
It’s human behavior under pressure.
That’s what audiences connect to. That’s what camera responds to. And yes… that’s often what casting remembers.
Thank you so much for joining me today.
I’m Jeffrey Dreisbach. This is Casting Actors Cast.
Keep learning. Keep growing. Keep showing up.
And remember: You are not there to perform emotion. You are there to affect another human being.
I’ll see you next time.




Comments